E1 Xi Jinping as a youth xi jinping led his first end poverty expedition in 1988; at age 15 he had been sent by the party to
live in a cave- therefore jinping is tristed to walk the talk on end poverty more than any leader with huge resources- and
best of all he loves open sourcing end poverty solutions around the world as part of his personal promise to end poverty in
china while he leads -see all jinping book up and out of poverty
Ningde province is undoubtedly just a "weak hatchling bird" in the vast space for developing the commodity economy.
I arrived in Ningde in June 1988 to take up my new post and as colleagues and I toured the nine counties of Ningde as well
as neighbouring Wenzhou, Cangnan and Yueqing in southern Zhejiang province, our thoughts never strayed far from the question-
in developing a commodity production economy in which "fish can leap at will in the boundless sea and bidrs can soar
free beneath the limitless sky" can this hatchling bird of Ningde be the first to fly, and how can we make it so? Xi
Jinping, Out of Poverty - more.... forward to vob 2017, in cheerleading the next 5 yeras of CP19, Xi Jinping has committed
to end overty in china by 2020 - how can all youth and teachers who want to map the sustainability goals race to end poverty both learn and help Xi Jinping as world record jobs creator
WELCOME friends of Youth (help map and co-edit 3 billion new jobs rsvp firstname.lastname@example.org )
race to sustain livelihoods and nature is now hundreds of times more valuable - and urgent - than the space race of the 1960;
why isnt the West participating in this in the networking forms it led in the 1960s?; how families from over the world should
thank our lucky stars that China is offenng peoples everywhere opportunities to design networking maps needed to co-create
the 3 billion most valuable livelihhods ever seen
.What if the leader of the world’s biggest nation
believed his peoples development connected with successfully helping other peoples development.
economic support for such a belief?
Would the majority of the world’s peoples trust the sincerity of such a leader?
presidency is the first to fully celebrate chinese peoples social start ups -note community building value in cgtn recently
nominations 4 modern china innovations bicycle sharing economy, mobile cash, buy or help make anything online,
fast trains with 4 from history paper, compass, movable print, fireworks - more EconomistChina.net
10 popular jinping ideas
sharing economy solutions
celebrate state's ability to scale microfranchises
cultural echnages at every new boundary
collaboration projects across supercities
big data small comunity apps
outreach to eg american places he studied in
deep love of other peoples cultures and parallels with chinese
deep womens empowerment exchnages xi's wife energises
friendship wit every place leader : whats first win-win trade we can celebate with our peoples
benefits of world elading infrastructure
redesigning development finances from viewpoint of half of tghe
world west has no direct experinec of
tailored strategic cooperation agreements
map simplest colaborations history (eg colonisation) missed
Breaking news nov 2017 slated for greatest jobs creation brainstorm
2 people have ever mediated
Teachers, students parents and community leaders who study what Xi Jinping helps people to do 2017-2022 get
freedom’s best chance to understand what supreme acts of collaboration will need to be mediated to be the world's number
1 jobs creator.
There are two
analytical lenses we recommend viewing win-win-wins with
hi-trust economics lens: a modern day adam smith would ask how does the leader of the most populous
nation search to make livelihoods better by helping win-win with making other peace-lovingpeoples livelihoods better
define the post-industrial revolution as the first time it was possible to map how to sustain a nation's youths
livelihods by linking in and designing apps to celebrate youth's livelihoods on every diverse map mother earth has to offer
eg Where does green big bang offer win-win opportunities
which warring over carbon did not? Or where does universal sharing of life critical service apps multiply value generated
out of each community ( a new maths opposite to zero-sum logics extrernalising gdps and trapping generations of youth
in elders paper currency ratings spun by consuming up things, and bubbling expomential risks)
These are the most exciting times to be alive but note the urgency of World Record Jobs Creation: the value
multipliers of collaborating around sharing solutions all communities need locally is not just humanity's greatest innovation
oportunity- it will determine whether nature decides our species is worth exponentially growing all over mother earth.............................................
..ChinaFriendship Nations – Global
By economic size columns; http://blogs.worldbank.org/publicsphere/world-s-top-100-economies-31-countries-69-corporations
by friendship network rows
* known China CSpartner; 1-11 GeoTrading
G E R M A N Y
F R A N C E
T U R K E Y
A R G E N
F I N L A
T H A I
K E N Y A
The paradox facing the world's number 1 record job creator involves designing intergenerational
investment partnerships but ones that must not delay sustainability goals deadlines beyond 2030-
do so would be to devalue the first and all subsequent generations who we have invested in mobilising universally ( in 2016
we are spending 1000 times more on mobileTECH than we did in 1946 – questioning leapfrog models (microsolar, cashless
mobile etc ) offers entrepreurial revolution unprecedented in human development )
Let's be very clear, good news springs up wherever Chinese
people demand that Xi Jinping develop the most extraordinary livelihoods possible for the half a billion chiense aged under
30 particularly quarter billion girls;
therefore the purpose of worldlwide youth –the greatest
#learninggeneration - needs to be that of helping reassure the majority of Chinese parents that Xi will achieive their aim
by maximising sustainability youth livelihoods across all friendly nations.
every week CGTN covers a latest dialogue between xi jinping and other potential
we welcome other nominations of other best ever platforms for valuing youth rsvp email@example.com
Looking forward: The summits which english-speaking youth can learn most
from are those that China not only hosts but ensures have been prepped by many nations to have an after life as jobs creating
Lets explore some cases from the sorts of maps these summits navigate round.
china poverty aleviation 2020
jinping talks walk- his 2013 visit to hunan clarified village microfranchises suited to that region eg beekeeping, kiwi fruit
started first wave of training villagers in production and value chain models of these markets ; demanded
they peer to
peer extend these community value chains
days 5000 of chinas best graduates spend a year serving china by .living in vilages and replicating
transfer that jinping started - when this is overlaid with big data vilage tech apps - china's
alleviation program becomes one every developing country can gain from benchmarking..........................................
emerging news oct party conference 1; nov trwmp in beijing
related references E2 Sir Fazle Abed E3 Jack Ma
related references E2 Sir Fazle Abed E3 Jack Ma (E10-20 China's most pursposeful
business leaders - see WEN and Tech Choices) E4 Modi & Singh E5 Nilekani & Kalam E6 Ban Ki Moon E7 Amma E8 Abdul
Latif Toyota Foundation E9 Muhammad Yunus E21 Nilekani and Kalam ; E22 Gandhi family luknow'; E23 Maharishi; E24 Taddy
Blecher; E25 founder Aflatoun E26 Varkey (& WISE) E27 Prtaham founder
W1 Pope Francis
W2 Antonio Guterres W3 Tim Berners Lee W4 Larouche W5 Kissinger W6 cultural friendship founders of c100 W7 Soros W8
Michael Palin W9 Jim Kim W10 Paul Farmer W11 Pierre Trudeau W12 Williams & Freling W13 Quadir Brothers W14 Sal Khan W15 Paul Polak W16 Bridges Intl founder W17 Wendy Knopf W18 Don Tapscott W49 Jeff Skoll, W48 Larry Briliant,
W47 Al Gore, W46 Wilaims & Freeling W45 Harision Owen, W99-97 Smith, Wilson, Keynes W96 Deming W95 Drucker W94 Toffler
(Naisbitt) W93 Florence Nightingale W92 Alexander Fleming W91 James Grant. E99 team oral rehydration (and mother theresa),
E98 Gandhi&Montessori. E97 Mandela E96 Emperor Hiro Hito, E95 Akio Morita and Prince Charles E94 founder of singapore
as independent nation
The G20 is tasked to promote global growth. Under the current circumstances, we must answer two questions. The first
is how to make an accurate assessment of the health of world economy. The second is what are the right prescriptions for boosting
global growth and employment.
Our basic observation is that the profound impacts of the international financial crisis are
lingering, and the world economy is still in a period of deep adjustment. A review of the major global economic crises in
the 20th century shows that flawed responses from countries would often make economic recovery more difficult. During the
crisis this time, the countries concerned have adopted various fiscal and monetary measures, which have, to a certain extent,
stabilized the market and reversed the downward trend. However, as things stand now, the current crisis is far more complex
than any of the previous crises, and it cannot be fixed overnight. A multi-pronged approach is therefore required to overcome
the crisis. This explains why seven years into the crisis, the world economy is still slow in recovery and weak in growth.
old Chinese saying goes, "To cure a disease, one should treat its root causes; to fix a problem, one should target its
source." Taking a closer look at today's world economy, we can see that the momentum generated by the last round of scientific
and industrial revolution is waning and the potential for growth under the traditional economic system and model of development
is diminishing. At the same time, the problem of uneven development is far from being resolved, and the inadequacies of the
existing economic governance mechanism and structure have become more evident. These factors have weakened the momentum of
global growth and dampened effective demand, which are manifested in sluggish growth, rising unemployment, soaring debt level,
slump in trade and investment, deceleration of the real economy, excess leverage in the financial sector and turbulence in
the international financial and commodities markets. Like a person who falls ill, running a fever may just be the symptoms,
the root cause, however, lies with problems in the body system.
Once the root cause is located, targeted medicine must be prescribed.
As the premier forum for international economic cooperation, the G20 should identify its goal, set the direction and exercise
leadership. We should not only address the immediate challenge by stabilizing growth, but also tackle the root cause by gathering
momentum for long-term development. We should implement the outcomes of previous summits and strive to forge new consensus.
We should manage our own affairs well by taking effective measures at home, and respond to the challenges together through
closer cooperation. In this connection, I wish to make the following proposals.
First, strengthen macroeconomic policy communication
and coordination, and form synergy between our policies and actions. We have an old Chinese saying, "The going is difficult
when doing it alone; the going becomes easier when doing it with many others." The trend of the world economy in recent
years shows that in the age of economic globalization, no country can prosper in isolation. Coordination and cooperation is
the only viable choice. Members of the G20 are all major economies. Together, we represent over 80% of the global economy,
and naturally carry greater responsibilities for global growth. Therefore, we must and, in fact, can be more proactive in
We should take necessary fiscal and monetary policies in line with our respective national conditions to drive global
growth and maintain market stability in the world. Major developed economies should consolidate and strengthen the momentum
of recovery, while emerging markets and developing countries should overcome downward risks and pressure to keep growth on
track. In this process, the parties should pay particular attention to the communication and coordination of their respective
policies in order to avoid negative spillovers. For major countries who carry significant weight in the world economy, it
is all the more necessary for them to take into full consideration the impact of their macroeconomic policies on others and
increase the transparency of their policy-making process. China will continue to make its own efforts toward this end.
promote reform and innovation, and boost the medium- and long-term growth potential of the world economy. Innovation provides
the driving force for long-term global growth. A review of historical experience shows that the dynamism and creativity unleashed
through institutional reform and the new industries and products enabled by the advances in science and technology have been
essential for the world economy to turn the corner and recover from previous major crises.
One strong impression I have got
from meetings with Chinese entrepreneurs back at home and during my visits to foreign countries is that the new round of scientific
and industrial revolution is creating historic opportunities. New ideas and new business forms such as Internet+, sharing
economy, 3D printing and smart manufacturing are generating enormous business opportunities and demand. There is also huge
potential in upgrading traditional industries with new technologies. We should seize the opportunities, and make innovation-driven
development and cultivation of new growth points the new priorities of G20 cooperation. We should make greater efforts on
both supply and demand sides, accelerate the transition from old to new drivers of growth, work together to create new, effective
and sustainable global demand, and set the direction for world economic growth.
Third, build an open world economy and reinvigorate
international trade and investment. Growth in international trade has been slower than that of the world economy for three
consecutive years. In 2014, foreign direct investment around the world dropped by 8%. This is something that deserves close
attention. If the world economy could be compared to a human body, trade and investment is like its blood. If the blood vessels
are blocked, the health of the world economy would be at risk.
Therefore, revitalizing trade and investment and restoring these
two engines of the world economy to high-speed operation is another priority for the G20. We should reject protectionism and
uphold and strengthen the multilateral trading regime in order to provide sufficient space for the development of different
countries. We should ensure that regional free trade arrangements serve as a useful complement to multilateral trading regime,
rather than create new obstacles or barriers. We should work for balanced, meaningful and development-oriented outcomes of
the 10th WTO Ministerial Conference and endeavor to realize the goal of the development round as early as possible.
implement the 2030 sustainable development agenda and lend strong impetus to equitable and inclusive development. To eliminate
poverty and hunger and achieve equitable, open, all-round and innovation-driven development, this is not only our shared moral
responsibility, but will also unlock immeasurable effective demand. At the UN Sustainable Development Summit last September,
together with many of the leaders in this room, we adopted the 2030 sustainable development agenda. As most of the world's
major economies are represented in the G20, it has every reason and ability to set a good example by being the first to implement
China is committed
to lifting over 70 million people in rural areas out of poverty in the next five years. We will set up a fund for South-South
cooperation and increase investment in the least developed countries and support developing countries in their efforts to
implement the 2030 agenda. China will make implementation of the 2030 agenda part of its 13th Five-Year Plan. I suggest all
the G20 members come up with their own national plans of implementation which will be combined to form a G20 plan of action
to boost strong, sustainable and balanced global growth.
When it comes to creating the next 3 billion jobs , there is hardly any country that I am aware of whose youth gain from
seeing china as more of a competitor than a collaborator-
however even if your country decides to be governed
by the opposite view , the game of deciding which countries to linkin win-win trades with is hugely important to parctice
are so diverse in terms of their most urgent needs and most urgent capabilitie to serve
to explore, see eg these diferent ways of profiling nations
Top 10s by
Land Mass -10 largest = nearly
Population –each of China and India nearly 4 times larger than 3rd
GDP Nominal note tope
2 nations account 40%
GDp Nominal per capita dominated by small nations –rough –among nations in
USA 1 (20th) 57K$
Australia 2 49
Germany 3 48
Canada 4 46
UK 5 42
France 6 42
Japan 7 39
S Korea 8 38
Canada & Russia &
S Korea 2.0
Italy 10 36K
?China 15K; Indonesia 11k ; ?India 7k
China suggests that 9 key areas should be
prioritized in the implementation of the 2030 Agenda. These areas are:
Eradicating poverty and hunger through targeted measures to alleviate
and eliminate poverty, and enhancing agricultural production capacities and food security.
innovation-driven development strategies and generating momentum for sustainable, healthy and stable economic growth.
Advancing industrialization to inject impetus to coordinated development between urban and rural areas and among
the three dimensions of sustainable development.
Improving social security and social services to ensure equal
access to basic public services.
Safeguarding equity and social justice to improve people’s well-being
and promoting all-round human development.
Protecting the environment and building protective barriers
Addressing climate change actively and integrating climate change response into national
Promoting efficient utilization of resources and sustainable energy.
national governance and ensuring economic and social development in line with the rule of law.
Implementing the 2030 Agenda is a systemic project. The international community needs to provide sound
support from five dimensions including:
Strengthening capacity building of countries so as to improve institution building, increase
public resources, and generate internal growth momentum.
Creating an enabling international environment for
development, building a balanced, win-win and inclusive multilateral trading system and improving global economic governance.
Engaging with all stakeholders and working towards a more equitable and balanced global partnership for development.
Promoting coordination mechanism and incorporating development policy into global macroeconomic policy coordination.
Improving follow-up and review by conducting regular reviews of global implementation progress while review of
national implementation would be done according to respective national conditions and the principle of voluntary action.
2016 is the first year of implementing the 2030 Agenda
for Sustainable Development. China has made great efforts in its implementation, linking the 2030 Agenda with domestic mid-and-long
term development strategies. The domestic coordination mechanism for the implementation, comprised of 43 government departments,
has been established to guarantee the implementation. Great efforts has been be made to publicize the 2030 Agenda nationwide
in order to mobilize domestic resources, raise public awareness, and creating favorable social environment for the implementation.
China will also strengthen inter-sector policy coordination, review and revise relevant laws and regulations to provide policy
and legislative guarantee for the implementation. In the next 5 years, China is determined to lift all the 55.75 million rural
residents living below the current poverty line out of poverty, and to double its GDP and people's per capita income of 2010.
China has already released the Position Paper on the Implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, which
reflects China’s views on the principles, priorities, policies and progress made in the implementation of the 2030 agenda.
The position paper has been circulated as an UN General Assembly document to member states in April. China will also issue
its national plan of implementing the 2030 Agenda this year and share its development experience with other countries.
As the G20 Presidency this year, China puts development
issues at the heart of the G20 agenda, and lists Inclusive and Interconnected Development as one of the four key agenda items.
With China’s efforts, G20 has placed the issue of development in a prominent position in its global macro policy framework
for the first time, to optimize development policy coordination. It is the first time that G20 members has jointly drafted
a collective action plan on the 2030 Agenda to inject political impetus into the global implementation progress on the 2030
Agenda. And it is also the first time that G20 has discussed the issues of Supporting Industrialization in Africa and Least
Developed Countries to actively respond to demands of developing countries, especially African countries. China has also convened
outreach dialogues with non-G20 countries and invited the largest numbers of development countries in G20 history to participate
in all activities this year, to ensure that G20’s actions meet outside expectations.
As a responsible and large developing country, China will continue to actively take part in global development
cooperation. It has provided support for more than 120 developing countries in achieving MDGs. In the future, China will deepen
South-South cooperation to help other developing countries to implement the 2030 Agenda. China is currently implementing the
measures announced by President Xi Jinping during his attendance at UN Summits Marking the 70th Anniversary, providing other
developing countries with support in financing, technology and capacity building. China is making preparations for the Assistance
Fund for South-South Cooperation, which will be put into operation as soon as possible. The Academy of South-South Cooperation
and Development has been established and starts global enrollment in 2016, which will provide developing countries with opportunities
for doctor’s degree and master’s degree education and short-term training. China has signed agreements on China-UN
Peace and Development Fund with the UN and the fund will be put into operation in 2016 to finance projects concerning peace
and development. China will carry forward the Belt and Road Initiative and promote the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank
and the New Development Bank and other institutions to play greater roles with a view to making contribution to global development.
Looking ahead, China will shoulder the responsibility of implementing
the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, follow a development path featuring mutual benefit, win-win results and common
development, and work with all countries to build a better future of sustainable development for all mankind.
Needs to Know First About Economics
Economics designs peoples futures but this depends
on what logics are analysed- here are the logics The Economist used in the early 19080s when it discussed how the net gneration
could be the most productive time for youth
nation/place cannot sustain growth unless its capital is structured so that family's savings are invested in their next generation's
productivity. Norman Macrae's 1954 book on The London Capital Market provides chapter and verse. Historically it
was timely as London's industrial revolution had planted most of the developed world's laws and financial instruments. Futurewise
this book became a source for Norman's forty years of leadership challenges including 3000 editorials. THese became branded
in the 2 genres of entrepreneurial revolution and future history of the net generation genre which he focused on from 1972.
They script in practical details most of the changes that economists would need to make to historic rules if globalisation
is not to collapse the worldwide financial system of 2010s
Norman framed his
writings on future purposes huan most wanted around the idea that The Net Generation to 2024 would face change on a scale
never previously experienced by our human race. To prevent risks and celebrate job creating opportunities Norman proposed
in his 1984 book (The 2024 Report) that the world should unite around youth's most exciting millennium goal. He explained
why economics would design the most popular futures if the goal was chosen as racing to end poverty everywhere. Reasons
included: its possible, its exciting, it creates jobs post-industrial generation will need to design around collaborative
technology, it can empower youth to joyfully unite cultures as we become borderless (more connected than separated), it aligns
economics principles with nature's exponentially (compounding) rules of evolutionary selection which are community-up and
We are shocked how few people know of the main
findings of the renowned economist Maynard Keynes- increasingly only economics riles the world and the greatest risk to the
future working lives of our children comes from elderly macroeconomists who hire themselves out to the biggest who want to
Historically when faulty systems
of macroeconomists ruined civilisations they fell one by one. But Einstein took Keynes logic further and hypothesised that
the first generation to become more connected than separated by technology would be subject to a final exam. Now if we let
erroneous macroeconomists rule whole continents of nations will collapse.
By 1976 my father (Norman macrae) -probably the last student of economics
mentored by Keynes- was writing at The Economist why the next half century would see the net generation
tested - he called upon the genre of Entrepreneurial Revolution (ER) networkers to sort out the greatest innovation
challenge economics - and so the human race - will ever face .
The opportunity of 10 times
more productivity for the net generation (with million times more collaboration technology than man's 1960's race to moon)
THREAT is preventing the threat of collapsing continent-wide
system of value exchange. By 2020 the (exponential track impacting future) sustainanbilyty of every village around the globe
will likely be lost or won
How could we be experiencing record youth unemployent when we are living in a time
of a million times more collaboration tech than a generation ago? According to research by Entrepreneur networks started at
The Economist in 1976, we are 36 years off track in compounding 2 unustainable systems whose follies multiply each other
that caused by non-economic media which also distracts us with glossy images and
soiundbites instead of future realities and integrated cross-cultural and inter-generational understanding - full briefing here
World's biggest maths error compounded by macroeconomists and all global professions
with a ruling monopoly - see below
Discuss: what does everyone need to know about the way economists think and behave. Understand 2 opposite
segments of E : The Unacknowledged Microeconomist and the Fatally Conceited.MacroEconomist
- because economics will incresingly rule the world, the greatest danger to the futures of youth is elderly macroeconomists
where fame maks them compete to superpower over peoples
historic significance of capitalism is precisely a society in which exchange has become a more important source of power than
threat**** in his book economics as science
Von hayek- given the fatal conceit in my profession, I really think you shouldn't be doing this - awarding
me a first Nobel Prize in economics
speech and everything about the future you want, NOW depends on enough people knowing how to play the value exchange game
- and why that isnt exactly what the game of monopoly teaches - an exchange is where each side says I wants something from you so let's work out what I
can do for you and purposefully improve on this over time through hi-trust communal feedback
debate difference between true capitalism and phoney capitalism
agree on a picture like
that on the right- we have seen cases where one of the 10 coordinates shown felt the system had betrayed their greatest
trust, and so zeroised the organsaition or network (even ones that accountants had been reprorting record profits ahd $100
start discussing multi-win models - see our 4 favorites from 36
years of debates with entrepreneuruial revoltionaries
choose say 12 markets whose future
purpose is most vital to sustaining your children - and use media to agree what the greatest human purpose and corresponding
mkilennium goals are that need investing in to fee each market and youth's working lives in serving the most valuable purpose
get those (including all parents?) who save across generations to throw out speculators from banking systems
and capital markets - eg next time there is a bailout (which means taking your childrens money to refinance a bank) wipe out
shareholders; let them set lawyers on old managers and any politicians their pr's lobbied; keep savings accounts safe; restructure
bank so that it invests in youth productivity and sustaining communities not bubbles, and not trapping people in debt
Goodwill explains up to 90% of value impacts of any organsaition in a networked economy- yet no nation
yet requires that organisations it licences to audit goodwii. 20 years of research has proved the following reciprocal relationship
- the purposeful question" who would uniquely miss what if your organsaition did not exist?, has the reciprocal
question why let your organisation contnue to exist if it has broken my life-crtiical trust it promised to serve
valuetrue capitalism maps how each side win-win-win from other sides communal purpose over time -this goes
back over 250 years to the criteria of free markets adam smith demanded freedom of speech questioned - he talked
about the transparency of community markets where a rogue trader might fool some of the people but not for long and not for
too big to fail! - the journal of social business edited by adam smith scholars at his alma mater Glasgow University
advises people of any other tongue how to build up from adam's hi-trust ideas to such constructs as sustainable global vilage
networking first mapped by schumacher (another keynes alumni) - we have a library of free articles for you to choose and translate
phoney capitalism spins a monopoly, a non-free maket - one side rules by
saying I want to take more and more from all of you- esentially this is what rules when global accountants audit only how
much one side has profited/extracted withouth how much has it sustains other sides- phoney capitalism can only result in exponentai
meltdown becuase so much has been extracetd from system that its unsustainable for human lives or for nature or for both
Mobile Planet's Center of Entrepreneurial Revolution? globalgrameenisborn
· socialbusinessdecade · yunus69birthdaylondoncreativelabs.avi · yunusyouth...
MORE ABOUT WHERE VALUING NETGEN CAME FROM
- in the 1990s I was working with big 5 accountants;
I argued for a missing audit they needed to do as regularly as their monetisation audit; I called this how goodwill modelling
multiplies value around a gravitational purspoe ewhise gials all sides want to progress over time; it turns out that in knowlege
scetors over 90% of the future is bayesian predicatbale on quality of goodwill relationships-3 yeras before andersen crashed
I usd this model to warn them that if they stoped multiplying conflicts around true and fair they would be zeroised by society-
I didnt succeed in getting my advice to be acted on but at that time unseen wealth publications made by brookings and georgetwon
had just been banned by the incolimng bush adminsitration - who didnt like to be told that without the second aidt risks would
compound unseen- every collapse USA has seen a hand in during 2000s (and viralised to other nations since 2008) can be traced
to this mathenatical error
what can be done about this mess
-debate difference between true cpaitalism and
choose say 12 markets hose future purpose is most vital to sustaining your children - and use
media to aggree what the greatest huan purspose and corresponding mkilennium goals are that need investing in
thse who save across generations to throw out speculators from bankiing systems - eg next time there is a bailout (which means
taking your childrens money to refinace a bank) wipe out sharehilers; let them set lawyers on old managers and any politicians
their pr's lobbied; keep savings acconts safe; restructure bank so that it invests in youth productivity and sustaining communities
not bubbles, and trapping people in debt
-if you do this today's millions times more coalbration technology than
a generation ago can make the next decade the most productive time and joyful for youty and everyine to be alive instead
of the most dismal time where natios led by old macroecnomist put youth out of work
DO YOU KNOW...
Q: Original Purpose of Economics? A The Scotland of the 1750s was at the end of a first
generation to have found their country taken over by England's
Empire., So Adam Smith was motivated to start writing
about how to design systems so that peoples could could look forward to their next generation sustaining more productive lives
than they had had ... 7 quarters later keynes general theory issued humanity's greatest challenge- economics as a systems
science had reached the state that only economics rules the world ... more
Q: What do the man-made systems that rule the world look like? A Purposeful
value exchanges composed round 5 main flows of how productively peoples lives are used and 5 main demands human beings
make as co-workers, customers, owners, stewards of the globe, stewards of society at the village level - more
Q: Why can't human race in 21st C be sustained with choice of economics made by 20th C biggest
banks and govs etc? A Long Story: ER alumni are in their 37th year of offering debating scripts eg1 on wht some industrial age systems after world war 2 were designed to be too big to exist as the
first net generation became more connected than separated by geographical borders ... What is known is that 2010s is most
exciting decade to be an entrpreneur because our impacts define what will be possible for all our childrens' children more
World Class Brands are in 25th year (as a subnetwork of Norman Macrae's Entrepreneurial Revolution)
of helping sustain the most purposeful organsiations or markets in the world. Core to any charter of purpose is a quiz
revolving round this question- who would uniquely miss what if this didn't exist?.
From this Q&A's list of trust-flows, economics maps how to connect producers
and demanders of the exchange in multi-win models of purpose. Henceforth, potential conflicts with this goodwill
model are audited and resolved at every cycle so that unique purpose is celebrated to lead the future by
continuously multiplying the most value and trust. This model provides the simplest benchmark around all exponential
impact metrics of sustainability investement can be calculated and the transparency of all multi-win models are webbed
around pro-youth economics. Questions welcomed firstname.lastname@example.org washington dc hotline 1 301 881 1655
Microfinance Focus, November 4, 2011: Professor Muhammad Yunus was invited to deliver
a key note speech during the G20 Young Entrepreneurs Summit held in Nice, France. Professor Yunus addressed an audience of
more than 400 entrepreneurs from all G20 countries. In his speech, he shared his personal entrepreneurship experiences, his
faith in young entrepreneurs to be the pillars of society and the need to include poor countries in the discussion process
in making global decisions.
Professor Yunus being an entrepreneur himself started off creating the Grameen Bank that
provides microfinance services to the poor who had little access to financial provisions. From that, he ventured into a wide
number of social businesses such as Grameen Nursing College, Grameen Eyecare Hospitals, Grameen Shakti, etc.
always considered young entrepreneurs to be the most effective solution for the future. He said “In my opinion, G20
YES is a fabulous initiative, gathering so much energy and momentum from all over the world. Because of their creativity and
leadership, provided that they commit to share the value they create, these 400 young entrepreneurs in this room can change
Professor Yunus is also a member of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) Advocacy Group, advising
the Secretary General of the United Nations. Hence, he believes that the next generation of youths should be handed over the
process of the MDGs as soon as possible. He believes that entrepreneurs will have a key role to play in fulfilling the MDGs,
if they are committed to the social value created by their companies, and social business can be part of the solutions.
his speech, he added that the G20 needed to broaden its scope to deal with the current world crisis. It can no longer remain
a political forum with economic agendas. The G20 needs to create a social agenda as well. Professor Yunus proposes that ‘social
business’ should be brought to the agenda of G20, as one of the concrete and effective solutions to be considered for
immediate implementation so as to guide capitalistic investment towards social value and jobs creation, rather than sheer
profit maximization strategies. A social business is a cause-driven business where profits stay within the company for its
Lastly, Professor Yunus concluded that the G20 should be expanded into the G25, where poor countries
from each continent should be included in the global agenda which they are part of. He added that “Their problems are
inter-related with others, and their proposals of solutions should be considered by the most economically advanced countries
in making global decisions. A G25 would be a big step toward ensuring that global social issues are raised, and MDGs implementation
is fully shared on the global agenda. And finally, because fighting poverty together is the only way to bring long lasting
peace in this world.”
inquiries chris macrae info @worldcitizen.tv us tel 301 881 1655 ; us office 5801 nicholson lane
suite 404, North Bethesda, MD 20852 USA - skype chrismacraedc
Mapping is a process of discovery. Crucially maps are only as usable as updating correctness of bottom
up information. Think of your own use of a map. You look for the "you are here arrow". You want to be directed to
somewhere/someone you dont know how to get to; you want your return vist to be safe as well as a value multiplying win-win.
Does anyone remember the simplest findings of einstein and jon von neumann. Einstein proved
that to innovate more value you need to go more micro in what you model; von neumann showed that there is more value to be
networked by interfacing safe flows across systems instead of ruling over separation of boundaries. There isnt a single
global metrics profession that gets these mathematical -and natural - principles right. Unless we change this global
markets will cycle through ever greater collapse and more and more communities will lose sustainability. Mapmaking is that
critical an idea to what the net genration will achieve in 2010s; but its also one that children from primary age up can action
learn. Its simple. Its just that it works the other way round from top-down people's fatal conceit.
It explores how to make the invisible principles and practices of real wealth creation
visible, and therefore useable. Our planet needs case studies underline the search for new win-wins that build ‘system
integrity’ Trust-flow is the unseen wealth to invest sustainability in. Tranpsarently mapped it develops
a goodwill gravity tyhat invites with roleplayer in a community to multiply goodwill while sustaining their own cashflow..
Trust is not some vague, mushy, abstract warm-hearted sentiment. It is an economic powerhouse – probably just as economically
and socially important as oil. The point is, there are specific things you need to do to get trust flowing, just as
there are specific things you need to do to get oil flowing. And like oil trust has a dark side. Right now, the world is awash
with the carbon emissions which threaten the stability and sustainability of its ecosystems. Right now, the world is also
awash with the ‘carbon emission’ of trust – mistrust. Indeed it may well be that our ability to tackle the
one issue – the threat of environmental catastrophe – depends on our ability to tackle the other issue: how to
generate, deepen, extend and sustain trust.>br>But what is the best way of doing this? One thing is for sure. You don’t
build and sustain trust via some sentimental exercise of goodwill to all and sundry. There are three very simple principles
at the heart of effective trust generation. First, trust is generated via win-win relationships. It’s virtually
impossible to generate or sustain trust without mutual benefit for those involved. But beneficial outcomes are not enough
in themselves. For trust to be built and sustained, both sides need to signal a demonstrable commitment to finding win-win
ways forward. Such a commitment may require real changes to what we say and do. Second, real ‘win-wins’
are hardly ever purely financial or material. You don’t build trust simply by walking away with more cash in your pocket.
Trust works at all the dimensions and levels of human exchange. Yes, it’s about financial and material rewards. But
it’s also about purpose (what people want to achieve). It’s about politics with a small ‘p’: the use
and abuse of power, the crafting and application of rules of fair play. And it’s about emotions: the sometimes overwhelmingly
strong emotions, both positive and negative, that are generated when people deal with other peopleWhat’s constitutes
a ‘win’ – a sense of real improvement – is therefore highly specific. It depends absolutely on the
details of who the parties are, what they are trying to achieve, in what context. Building trus, therefore involves discovering
these specifics. Just as oil doesn’t flow out of the ground, get refined and pump its way into motor vehicles automatically
and without effort, so identifying and doing what is necessary to get trust flowing requires dedicated, skilled effort. It
requires a disciplined, structured process, not a vague sentiment.
3) Third, even if we do steps 1) and 2) there’s
still a good chance it won’t succeed. Why? Because it ignores an invisible third factor. In the real world, purely two
way bilateral relationships don’t exist. There is always a third party whose interests or outcomes are affected by what
the other two parties do but who is not a party to the contract. The environment is a case in point. Producers and consumers
may both benefit from buying and selling to each other – but what happens if, in doing so, they destroy the environment
they both depend on?
This raises a hugely important question. When two parties pursue win-wins and build mutual
trust, are they doing so in a way which creates a win and builds trust for the third party at the same time? Or are they simply
pushing the problems – and the mistrust – further down the line on to this third party? Building vigorous, healthy
networks of trust is a different kettle of fish to ‘you scratch my back and I’ll scratch yours’
win-win conspiracies. It requires a Map of all the key relationships plus careful consideration of knock-on consequences.
It requires a different perspective.
These three simple, basic steps do not happen automatically. They need to
be worked at. The territory needs to be deliberately Mapped and explored. What’s more, there are obstacles in our way
– mental and practical obstacles that need to be cleared. Prevailing economic theories about ‘rational economic
man’ for example, deny the need to commit to win-win outcomes. Instead, they promote supposedly ‘rational’
(i.e. narrowly selfish behaviours) which actively undermine trust The same theories insist that the only valid measure of
human benefit is money, thereby excluding from consideration many of the biggest opportunities for improvement. Meanwhile
many vested interests do not want to extend the circle of trust to third parties and complete networks because their positions
of power depend on their ability to take advantage of the weaknesses of these third parties. That’s another job for
Mapping: helping to identify and mount such obstacles. The potential benefits of doing so are unthinkably huge. They
start with a simple negative: the relief that comes from when you stop banging your head against a brick wall. Mistrust breeds
wasteful, wealth destroying conflict that tends to feed on itself. Anger and hatred engender anger and hatred. Simply easing
or stopping the terrible waste of mistrust would transform prospects for many millions of people. We desperately need to find
ways of doing this. Then there are the positive benefits. Understanding the real nature of human wealth – all those
dimensions of purpose, ‘politics’ and emotion as well as money and material comfort – means we can start
being human again; human in the way we think, and act. What’s more, many of these intangible benefits won’t cost
a penny. They’re there for the taking, if only we puts our minds to it. But there’s more, because trust is
also an economic superpower in its own right. In the pages that follow we will show conclusively that material and financial
riches are also dependent on trust. In fact, we will argue the case for going one step further. We will say that material
and financial riches are a by-product of trust: the visible fruits of invisible, intangible human exchange. Once you understand
that sustainable cash flows are a by-product of sustainable trust flows, your understanding of what makes a successful business
is transformed. Separately, each of these three fruits – reducing the waste of conflict, unleashing the potential
intrinsic benefits of human exchange, and energising the sustainable creation of material wealth – are massive in their
own right. Put them together and they represent a vast new continent of opportunity. As we said, this book is addressed
to entrepreneurs and system innovation revolutionaries. Wherever you happen to be, whatever the change you want to make
is, the principles explored in this book apply. The wish to change and the will to change are not the same as being able to
change successfully. For that you need to understand your territory. You will need new Maps
a continental or worldwide search solutions on job creation that can be replicated across communities been organised before
this EU launch of Nov 2011?
While alumni of entrepreneurial economics have always valued job creation searches- we know
of no clear evidence that this has been top of mind in the way that continental-wide government has operated since 1984 even
though it was scripted by The Economist's Unacknowledged Giant as the number 1 question the first net generation would need
to mediate if sustainable futures and humanity's most needed millennium goals are to be served
what's different about nov 2011 is 4 top directorates of the EU have nailed their future reputation to this search
Tom Ashbrook: You're
talking about, writing about the end of the EU, the end of the common currency.
Paul Krugman: it's
unthinkable except that continuing down the current path is unthinkable. Spain is actually the epicenter. The Spanish government
did nothing wrong. Spain was running a budget surplus before the crisis. It had low levels of debt. But it had a monstrous
housing bubble, as did a lot of places, largely financed by the way by German banks which were lending to Spanish banks, which
then lent on. And when the housing bubble burst you were left with a severe, extremely severe recession, and so the answer
has been government austerity which just makes the slump deeper.
The alternatives to a breakup of
the euro have to be Europe-wide solutions. And so the solution, if there is one, involves accepting a higher rate of inflation
for Europe as a whole and that particularly means higher inflation in Germany. --Paul Krugman
are Spain's alternatives here? Well, if they still had their currency, their own currency, the answer would be devalue, let
the peseta drop, Spanish exports would become a lot more competitive, they'd be well on their way to recovery. They don't
have their own currency, so people are saying: Well, you have to do all this stuff to stay within the Euro. At some point
you say: Well, you know if your answer to our problem is just ever more suffering, ever more you know... 25 percent, 50 percent
youth unemployment. If that's your notion of a solution, then maybe although it would be a very terrible thing to have the
Euro breakup, maybe that's better than what we're doing. So that's becoming a real possibility now.
to a breakup of the euro have to be Europe-wide solutions. And so the solution, if there is one, involves accepting a higher
rate of inflation for Europe as a whole and that particularly means higher inflation in Germany. Talk to the Germans about
this and of course they go crazy, but you have to say to them: What is your answer? What you're doing right now is just a
path to the collapse of the euro with enormous damage and radicalization and a lot of things that you don't want to see happen
in Europe happening.
TA: If the Germans can't take their foot off the brakes, they're just intrinsically
and against history and everything else, Weimar, if they can't do it, what happens?
PK: Then Europe
breaks up and... No, I mean I think it's that stark. It really is, it really is that extreme because you know it's one of
those things, you can't be saying that, but then you say: Well, let's talk this through. You know, let's as it said in the
original edition of the Godfather - Let us reason together. Right? What are the ways that this can work out? And the current
path is not one that can work out.
It's like an irresistible force hitting an immovable object. On the one hand it's
unthinkable that they'll allow the euro to fail because the euro is a terribly important thing, it's not terribly important
economically, it would have been better off if they'd, if they had never done it, but now that it has been done, for it to
fail is a defeat for the European project, the whole project of bringing peace, democracy, integration to a continent with
a terrible history. So it's unthinkable that they'll allow it to fail, but it's also unthinkable that the Germans will accept
moderate inflation which is the only solution any of us have been able to come up with. So one of two impossible things is
going to happen. Your bet.